I saw the part of the episode last night (October 6, 2010) "Who has seen" in which were given in the presence of his mother Concetta, news about the possible confession about the murder of his uncle's daughter Sara and research body.
I think it's a page of television shows such as timing of the news are quite distant from the time of pain.
The face and the eyes of Mrs. Concetta showed that it was not at all what I was saying, and moreover as one might think that a mother can comment on live television that her daughter may have been killed by his uncle. In the end he did nothing but defend himself from the extreme pain, pain squassante, linked to the words he heard.
The same news of the death is so complex and difficult to accept that she was not really possible to be the "active part" that the journalist expected. Those who, like me, has had numerous occasions to participate in the communication from the sudden and violent death of a relative who knows the most important attention should be given just at the time of the suffering of the person with whom you are speaking.
I sincerely regret that only after more than 20 minutes of direct someone has become aware of the "emotional violence" that was likely to commit to Mrs Concetta and also of Sabrina (the daughter of self-confessed) that we wanted at all costs on the scene.
The thing went well and I do not think it will be useful to anyone making processes, but at least open a discussion on these issues.
